In L.A., Birthplace of Sprawl, Homes on Transit Fetch More
Access to public transit is the new granite countertop when it comes to home listings.
That’s the takeaway from a study by real estate data firm Trulia, which looked at the language used to describe homes on the market in Los Angeles from 2013 to 2018. Mentions of the city’s transit almost doubled over the period and for all but the most expensive quarter of homes, sellers got rewarded for it. On average, the premium was 4.2 percent.
“Transit is becoming a selling point,” said Issi Romem, Trulia’s chief economist. It’s surprising that this correlation is happening in Los Angeles, “the birthplace of sprawl,” he said.
On some level, real estate agents are just tapping into the zeitgeist, the way they’ve grabbed onto other home features that buyers might value. (Stainless steel appliances, anyone?) Across the U.S., younger people are choosing to stay in urban areas longer, putting a premium on homes where they don’t have to get in a car to access their jobs or other amenities. Meanwhile, Los Angeles is in the midst of a $120 billion effort to improve and expand transit, making the system more useful for riders.
Rails to Riches
All but the priciest homes got a boost from advertising access to transit
At least one reason for the jump in listings touting transit has to do with the city’s investment during the study period. For instance, a 6.6-mile stretch of Metro’s Expo linefrom Culver City to Santa Monica opened in 2016, putting more homes in proximity to the train. The Gold line was also extended that year.
One wrinkle in Trulia’s study: Buyers of the most-expensive quarter of homes in Los Angeles paid slightly less for properties advertising transit access. Romem speculated that this has something to do with the fact that buyers at the higher end may be favoring lots in the hills, with views, or other features that aren’t as common in homes near trains. Trulia’s study adjusted for the number of bedrooms and house size, but not for views.
The price premium near transit should concern policy makers, because it means that it’s harder for lower-income people to afford to live near the lines. Romem said the best way to solve this is to increase density near transit stops. That could encourage a “virtuous circle” where the system gets more riders and people have more affordable places to live, he said.